Category: Court Filings

Affidavit of Truth to Declare Crime and Actions of Lafayette County, MS Unconstitutional

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH TO DECLARE CRIME AND ACTIONS OF LAFAYETTE COUNTY, MS UNCONSTITUTIONAL; ACCUSES SHERIFF OF INSURRECTION THROUGH THE MANUFACTURE OF CRIMES THAT DEPRIVE AND CHILL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

Lafayette County Sheriff Joey East now stands accused of Massive Abuse of Power, Insurrection, Conspiracy to Deprive Constitutional Rights, Deprivation of State and Federal Constitutional Rights, Civil Rights Violations, & more in new 12-page sworn affidavit/declaration filed in Lafayette County on 1/3/2022!

A Shocking set of facts have now emerged and shocking claims made in this latest move to not only detail out the truth in fact but to declare crimes committed by Lafayette County Officials, in particular Sheriff Joey East
Affidavit of Truth to Declare Crime and Actions of Lafayette County, MS Unconstitutional

This bold move would ultimately go to declaring the actions of Lafayette County Rogue and Unconstitutional, and in violation of State and Federal Law. Reardon claims the extreme low blow moves to abscond and cover up prior unlawful acts has led it to committing one of the most sinister of attacks on a Citizen and Reporter simply for him investigating the source of court records being mysteriously changed in its Circuit Court system. An extreme abuse of power through obnoxious lies and information given to Communicare by Lafayette County Sheriff’s Department and in particular Sheriff Joey East in order to have Matt Reardon Involuntarily taken on a writ based on complete lies and fraudulent statements in order to Judicially Commit Reardon to a State Mental Hospital. All of this the day after Reardon discovers the “randomly” assigned circuit court judge had mysteriously been changed for a 2nd time in just over 1 year’s time, and starts asking questions. All of this on a second opened circuit court matter which Reardon claims Sheriff Joey East has direct interest and involvement in. Reardon claims in the 12-page filing that the latest moves, particularly when combined with past occurrences, rise to the level of insurrection committed by ranking county and state officials

See the events leading up to what Reardon alleges was a Completely Low-Blow, Conspired upon Attack that was organized and orchestrated by Lafayette County Officials and in particular East to intimidate and remove not only a private citizen, but a credentialed Journalist/Reporter on December 7, 2021. Reardon claims that the move was 100% calculated and fraudulent, rising far above and beyond a simple coincidence in timing. Even more shocking, on 12/30/2021. It was made known that Local Law Enforcement tying directly to the Lafayette County Sheriff Joey East had tendered the most obnoxious, damning of lies to Rachel Alcorn, an employee of Communicare, in a successful attempt to get Communicare to seek Judicial Commitment of Matt Reardon. Reardon claims this fact alone is more than enough to allege that Lafayette County Officials conspired with at least one Private Citizen and likely multiple to successfully deprive a citizen and credentialed member of the press of his civil rights and that the actions that occurred CHILL the constitutional rights of other citizens until such time this atrocity is properly rectified. He says this most certainly calls for examination and overhaul of an outdated, careless, and easily manipulable system that the State of Mississippi Government has fully exploited, taken advantage of, and has a high tendency of repeating again.
Read the updated article, See the evidence currently uploaded, & See the Court Filings at
https://ridingwiththeoutlaw-549187.ingress-earth.easywp.com/a-fraudulent-commitment/

REARDON ENDS THE AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION WITH A NOTICE GIVEN. “THIS AFFIDAVIT STANDS AS NOTICE OF PENDING LITIGATION AND AS SUCH WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO PROVIDE SUCH NOTICE OF INTENT. THIS AFFIDAVIT AND YOUR RESPONSE OR LACK THEREOF WILL ACCOMPANY THE FEDERAL COMPLAINT WHICH WILL BE FILED 15-DAYS FROM TODAY”

HE CLAIMS HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNDER THE FIRST AND FOURTH AMENDMENT AS MADE APPLICABLE TO THE STATES BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ALONG WITH A PLETHORA OF STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS WERE VIOLATED AT THE MALICE HANDS OF THE LAFAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF & OTHER LAFAYETTE COUNTY OFFICIALS.

Issues in the Supreme Court Stemming from Major Problems with Attorney General Lynn Fitch

Matt Reardon doesn’t hold back when discussing discontent and more for the Attorney General Lynn Fitch and the latest move by her Office in the Supreme Court. Things may be turning much more tumultuous in the coming week in the State Judiciary

Matt Reardon doesn’t hold back when discussing discontent and more for the Attorney General Lynn Fitch and the latest move by her Office in the Supreme Court.  Things may be turning much more tumultuous in the coming week in the State Judiciary

Merry Christmas and a Few Words from Me

The GravE Situation the State of Mississippi Judiciary now finds itself in HAS CONTINUED TO TOLL. It truly hit home with me this Christmas as I realized all that has been lost over the past 4 years.

Not only for myself but society as a whole. All lost time and opportunities with my family and my kids. And the fact that this vicious legal atrocity spinning further and further out of control far passed the definition of “On Tilt” because they picked a fight, the wrong fight, with the wrong one this time. So I took a little time after wrapping my mind around the very quick denial issued by Judge Chris Childers on 12/8/21 in response to the detailed Rule 59 Motion I filed in Lafayette County Justice Court on 12/6/21.

FIRST AND FOREMOST THE CONTROLLING LEGAL JURISPRUDENCE THAT STANDS OUT UPON DOING A LITTLE EXTRA DIGGING INTO THIS PARTICULAR MATTER COMES FROM FEDERAL COURT WHICH GOES ON TO STATE:

A state-court decision is contrary to federal law if the state court applies a rule that contradicts controlling Supreme Court authority or “if the state court confronts a set of facts that are materially indistinguishable from a decision” of the Supreme Court, but nevertheless arrives at a different result. Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 406 (2000).

[The [Supreme] Court has consistently held that a conviction obtained by the knowing use of perjured testimony is fundamentally unfair, and must be set aside if there is any reasonable likelihood that the false testimony could have affected the judgment of the jury.” United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 103 (1976) (footnotes omitted)

A state denies a criminal defendant due process when it knowingly uses perjured testimony at trial or allows untrue testimony to go uncorrected. Faulder v. Johnson, 81 F.3d 515, 519 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 995, 117 S.Ct. 487, 136 L.Ed.2d 380 (1996), citing, Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 79 S.Ct. 1173, 3 L.Ed.2d 1217 (1959). To prove a due process violation based upon a prosecutor's use of perjured testimony, a habeas petitioner must demonstrate that (1) the testimony was actually false; (2) the state knew that it was false; and (3) the testimony was material. See id; Boyle v. Johnson, 93 F.3d 180, 186 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1120, 117 S.Ct. 968, 136 L.Ed.2d 853 (1997).

ALL 3 OF THE STATED CRITERIA PROVING DUE PROCESS VIOLATION HAVE BEEN MET AND DOCUMENTED VIA MOTION BY THE DEFENSE

To constitute a due process violation, the prosecutorial misconduct must be “of sufficient significance to result in the denial of the defendant’s right to a fair trial.” Greer v. Miller, 485 U.S. 756, 765 (1987) (quoting United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985).

Under this standard, a petitioner must show there is a reasonable probability the error complained of affected the outcome of the trial—i.e., that absent the alleged impropriety, the verdict probably would have been different

I wholeheartedly believe that I have both sufficiently raised the issue/matter and in fact the particular serious grievances involving what evidence entered at trial proves to not only be perjured testimony introduced at trial. but perjured testimony which went uncorrected by the prosecution. The combination of the two most certainly rises above and beyond the aforementioned standard required to constitute a due process violation and more than one had occurred.

Prejudice is actual harm resulting from the alleged constitutional violation. Thomas v. Lewis,945 F.2d 1119, 1123 (9th Cir. 1991). In the extraordinary case, “[a] fundamental miscarriage of justice’ occurs when `a constitutional violation has probably resulted in the conviction of one who is actually innocent.'” Boyd v. Thompson,147 F.3d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir. 1998) (quoting Murray,477 U.S. at 495-496, 106 S.Ct. 2639).

I would now make the notion that denial of Defendant’s Rule 59 Motion harbors on a true fundamental miscarriage of justice occurring.

In an effort to attempt to curve compliance back to normal, operable judicial and legal standards and in an effort of good faith prior to filing a petition in District Court, I would respectfully ask that Judge Chris Childers reconsider his order given 12/8/2021.

Lafayette County and the State of Mississippi MUST take accountability for that which it directly created. It must come to the understanding based on all facts known and presented that it’s own foul, immoral, and unlawful decisions can 100% directly be attributable to creating the massive legal turmoil and in turn the perceivable “monster” that certain individuals reading this email would make me out to be. If we are to completely ignore all prior jurisprudence and long decided case law, then where does that leave us as a society? The answer my friends becomes a lawless society, without care for the rights of one which makes us not care about the rights of all. It’s one of the biggest reasons I have Preached on the importance of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution which guarantees equality through guaranteeing to all citizens the fundamental right to equal protection of the laws meant to apply to all.

I believe we all need to take some self-accountability. I certainly believe those appointed or elected to positions of authority within the Government MUST be held to a much higher standard of accountability than those who aren’t, in order to prevent future miscarriages of justice such as this or worse from happening.

Please wait while flipbook is loading. For more related info, FAQs and issues please refer to DearFlip WordPress Flipbook Plugin Help documentation.

GOD BLESS AND MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Motion to Alter, Amend, or Vacate Judgement/ Appeal of Justice Court “November-9 Mob Dominated Trial”

Matt Reardon goes above and beyond expectations in filing a M.R.C.P Rule 59 Motion to Alter, Amend, or Vacate Judgement/ Appeal of Justice Court “November-9 Mob Dominated Trial” on 12/3/2021 less than 2 weeks after Filing a Rule 60 Motion to re-open his 2017 Criminal Case in which he alleges complete deprivation of his Due Process/Constitutional Rights

Matt Reardon goes above and beyond expectations in filing a M.R.C.P Rule 59 Motion to Alter, Amend, or Vacate Judgement/ Appeal of Justice Court “November-9 Mob Dominated Trial” on 12/3/2021 in Lafayette County Circuit Court.


This new motion filed less than 2 weeks after Filing a Rule 60 Motion in his 2017 Criminal Case to re-open the case in which he alleges intentionally deprived him of his Due Process/Constitutional Rights in an organized, staged attack on him on May 26, 2017. This newest litigation not only notices but serves to commence litigation in not only State but Federal Court as well, and this Rule 59 motion reveals shocking details revolving around the criminal charges that brought about trial November 4, 2021 in Lafayette County Justice Court. Reardon fully believes that the matters set to litigate in Lafayette County not only constitute significant civil liability for the County, but that criminal indictments are most certainly warranted as well due to serious criminal acts committed by Lafayette County Officials and employees acting both personally as well as in their official capacity as an employee/agent/official of the State of Mississippi

Please wait while flipbook is loading. For more related info, FAQs and issues please refer to DearFlip WordPress Flipbook Plugin Help documentation.

Writ of Prohibition- Chancellor Robert Q Whitwell

After filing a notice of appeal and a Petition for Writ of Mandamus based on Judge Whitwell’s rulings, the Chancery Court Judge defies expectations in denying a petition of Reardon’s. In response Reardon snap files a petition for writ of prohibition with the MS Supreme Court

Petition For Writ of Prohibition To Be Directed to the Trial Judge
Chancellor Robert Q Whitwell
FILED NOVEMBER 2ND 2021

Please wait while flipbook is loading. For more related info, FAQs and issues please refer to DearFlip WordPress Flipbook Plugin Help documentation.

MS Attorney General responds to Court of Appeals Motion for Peremptory Reversal. Here is my response back

[presto_player id=6626]

Disgust and Tasteless are the two words that instantaneously come to mind when I read over this response by MS Attorney General Lynn Fitch and her Special Assistant Attorney General Barbara Byrd. It would certainly appear on its face that they are choosing to attack my appeal on grounds of technicality, not facts and merits. This is certainly no surprise to me, although it is disheartening in that this office is demonstrating their much higher interest in the rules set forth in the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure while batting an eye and throwing care to the wind when it comes to the Mississippi Rules of Criminal Procedure. In my opinion, all law enforcement officials and most definitely the State Attorney General MUST put a much higher level of care and interest in making sure the rights of the accused are protected, which involves having full knowledge of and placing the highest of priorities into the Rules of criminal first and foremost

Reardon Files Shocking LAST MINUTE motion with Court Of Appeals to Vacate Plea and Reverse Original Judgement in 2017 Criminal Case

In 2017 he was banished from Oxford, MS and Lafayette County along with signing a Covenant to Not Sue the City, County, Sheriffs Department, Elected Officials, and Employees. Now In 2021, Matt Reardon AKA Oxford Outlaw files an absolutely shocking Last minute “One and Done” motion for Peremptory Reversal to the Mississippi Court of Appeals at 11:59pm on September 16th to vacate his plea made and reverse judgement and order of the original 2017 criminal charge!

Reardon files absolutely shocking Last minute “One and Done” motion for Peremptory Reversal to Mississippi Court of Appeals at 11:59pm to vacate plea and reverse judgement and order of original 2017 criminal charge!

Reardon’s Motion for Peremptory Reversal submitted just before midnight on 9/16/2021

COA-Motion-for-Peremptory-Reversal

MS Attorney General Lynn Fitch & Special AG Barbara Byrd issues response on 9/20/2021

state-response-to-peremptory-reversal

My Rebuttal to the Response from the State Attorney General’s Office

rebuttal-to-state-response-coa

A very concerning fact starts to show clearly when assessing the facts and the response given by the State Attorney General’s Office. Attorney General Lynn Fitch’s Office demonstrates a much higher interest, and clearly knowledge, in the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure than the Mississippi Rules of Criminal Procedure. This should never be the case! The rights of the accused should always be preserved and held at a much higher level at the trial stage so as not to completely violate the rights of an innocent citizen such as what happened with my particular case. When the Mississippi Rules of Criminal Procedure are completely violated and Due Process Rights of the accused are not afforded which in turn sways the outcome in a particular legal matter, that legal matter in turn should be viewed as VOID, even FRAUDULENT through manifest procedural error committed by the state making an appeal essentially pointless to fight by the State. In this particular case, you have the State AG’s office fighting to dismiss the appeal on technicality, but where is any type of responsibility taken for the major deprivation of essentially all due process rights which the state is mandated to provide under both State and Federal Law?